Mut v. Newark Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Article 667 [applies] to all instances wherein an activity, work, structure or building on an owner's property causes unwarranted damage to neighboring property”
• holding that “Article 667 [applies] to all instances wherein an activity, work, structure or building on an owner's property causes unwarranted damage to neighboring property”
• holding that “Article 667 [applies] to all instances wherein an activity, work, structure or building on an owner's property causes unwarranted damage to neighboring property”
• failure to supervise and improper design

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).