Mut. Holding Co. v. Limbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Generally, a parent and subsidiary are separate and distinct legal entities. This is so even if the parent owns all the outstanding shares of the subsidiary.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ohio Grocers Assn. v. Levin
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-09-17· cited 25×
• Fifth Third Bank v. Senvisky
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 9×
• Barrientos v. Barrientos
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-11· cited 7×
• SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Tracy
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-08-16· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Celina Mutual Ins. v. Bowers
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1965-12-29· cited 21×
• Mutual Holding Co. v. Limbach
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 18×
• Hoover Universal, Inc. v. Limbach
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-08-28· cited 15×
• Bank One Dayton, N.A. v. Limbach
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 13×