Skip to main content
· 8/19/1999

Muszak v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 63 F. Supp. 2d 292
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13105
  • 1999 WL 668898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] Title VII retaliation claim must be for actions protected by Title VII, and, quite simply (unlike the ADA that has its own retaliation prohibition), Title VII does not protect a request for an accommodation on the basis of an alleged disability.” (footnotes omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.