Mustapha Younes v. Christopher Pellerito

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that conflicting testimony is not the type of evidence that utterly discredits the plaintiff’s version of the facts
• finding that on review of a qualified immunity denial, the police officers’ ' statements contradicting the plaintiffs version of events were “not the type of evidence in the record which ‘utterly discredits’ ” the plaintiffs evidence
• noting defendant officers’ “testimony about the incident is not the type of evidence in the record [that] ‘utterly discredits’” a plaintiff’s account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).