Skip to main content
· 11/28/1892

Musser v. Gray

Citations

  • 3 Cal. Unrep. 639
  • 31 P. 568
  • 1892 Cal. LEXIS 1045

Syllabus

<p>Judgment — Satisfaction.— M. Held a Judgment Against G., which he agreed to release if G. would deliver him a deed to certain property, which he did. Prior to such agreement, G. had made an assignment of all his property for the benefit of his creditors. M. knew that G. had made an assignment, but denied knowing that it included the specified property. G. made no attempt to conceal any fact. Held, that an order directing the entry of satisfaction of the judgment was proper.1</p>

Judges: Temple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.