Musket Corp. v. PDVSA Petroleo, S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant did not provide sufficient facts to suggest that the principal was aware that the alleged agent would be perceived as the principal’s agent
• “Satisfaction of the statutory criteria [] does not guarantee that a court will issue such a relief. ‘[S]uch relief is discretionary, and since attachment is a harsh remedy, the court must exercise care in its application.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).