Mushalla v. Teamsters Local No. 863 Pension Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Fischer only requires disclosure of changes to benefits plans in response to an inquiry by a beneficiary
• explaining that Fischer only requires disclosure in response to an inquiry by a beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).