Musgrave v. Calder Race Course, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was proper to deny ex-punction of a firefighter’s record where he pled nolo contendere to the unlawful purchase of cocaine, given that his occupation required him to be ready “at any given moment ... to render assistance in a life threatening situation”
• explaining that the purpose of the 1988 amendment to former section 943.058 was to grant discretion to the trial courts, thus overturning district court of appeal precedent holding that the trial courts were without discretion
• stating it was not an abuse of discretion for the tidal court to find that, because the petitioner was a public employee, the public had a right to know of the petitioner’s criminal history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).