Skip to main content
· 4/14/2008

Museum of Modern Art v. Schoeps

Citations

  • 549 F. Supp. 2d 543
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30717
  • 2008 WL 1746462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that declaratory judgment is an appropriate remedy for holder of artwork to resolve a challenge to ownership
  • noting an individual party’s capacity to appear in the lawsuit is governed by the law of his domicile
  • “Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b)(1), the capacity to sue or be sued of ‘an individual who is not acting in a representative capacity’ is determined ‘by the law of the individual's domicile.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jed S. Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.