· 4/14/2008
Museum of Modern Art v. Schoeps
Citations
- 549 F. Supp. 2d 543
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30717
- 2008 WL 1746462
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that declaratory judgment is an appropriate remedy for holder of artwork to resolve a challenge to ownership
- noting an individual party’s capacity to appear in the lawsuit is governed by the law of his domicile
- “Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b)(1), the capacity to sue or be sued of ‘an individual who is not acting in a representative capacity’ is determined ‘by the law of the individual's domicile.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jed S. Rakoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.