Skip to main content
· 3/7/2003

Muse v. Muse (In Re Muse)

Citations

  • 289 B.R. 619
  • 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 177
  • 40 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 270
  • 2003 WL 1023310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • creditor had “ample opportunity” to file a complaint before the deadline to file suit had passed
  • notice provided seventy-seven days prior to deadline for nondischargeability complaint sufficient
  • notice provided seventy-seven days prior to deadline for nondischargeability complaint sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernard Markovitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.