Muse v. Day (In Re Day)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that jury’s finding of “constitutional malice” in state-court defamation action “collaterally estopped [debtor] from contesting that he acted maliciously, as required by Section 523(a)(6)”
• “Every court that has considered the issue has held that state court judgments for abuse of process are nondischargeable under section 523(a)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).