Musco v. United Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiffs' Tennessee antitrust law claim where they had \not identified any Tennessee-specific allegations supporting [their] claim\
• rejecting antitrust defendants’ claim that plaintiffs are precluded from pursuing a class action under consumer protection statutes of various states
• rejecting antitrust defendants’ claim that plaintiffs are precluded from pursuing a class action under consumer protection statutes of various states
• rejecting antitrust defendants’ claim that plaintiffs are precluded from pursuing a class action under consumer protection statutes of various states
• “Even if Justice Stevens’s plurality opinion applied, Defendant has not identified any authority for concluding that the class action bars at issue are so intertwined with a state-created right or remedy as to justify finding that it trumps Rule 23 . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).