North Dakota Supreme Court· 1/6/2022
Muscha v. Krolik
Citations
- 969 N.W.2d 142
- 2022 ND 4
Syllabus
Evidence that is suppressed in a criminal case may be admissible in a subsequent civil proceeding. A district court's award of primary residential responsibility is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,184×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- State v. ManningNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1965-03-18· cited 59×
- Tarnavsky v. TarnavskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-10-18· cited 26×
- State v. GovanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1963-08-22· cited 8×
- Burgess v. N.D. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-12-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.