Skip to main content
· 9/28/2006

Musarra v. Digital Dish, Inc.

Citations

  • 454 F. Supp. 2d 692
  • 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1758
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70442
  • 2006 WL 2779856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant’s use of a “complex tracking system” informing defendant when a particular piece of equipment is installed and activated for the customer weighed in favor of finding a continuity of movement across state lines
  • finding that out-of-state supplier and manufacturer’s retention of control of products while stored in the defendant’s warehouse weighed in favor of applying the MCA exemption
  • finding interstate commerce element met, where defendant shipped products based on anticipated cus tomer need
  • “On occasion, courts refer to ‘motor private carriers’ as ‘private motor carriers.’”
  • providing detailed discussion of this issue
  • stating the same in dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marbley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.