Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming convictions for both kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault from single criminal episode because elements of both crimes were present
• stating “the appellate court must determine that it has jurisdiction,” which “is limited to final judgments which dispose of all claims against all parties”
• “Even though the parties do not raise the issue, the appellate court must determine that it has jurisdiction.”
• even if the parties do not raise the issue, the court must determine whether it has jurisdiction.
• \Rule 54(b) language does not make the judgment final and appealable\ when judgment disposed of some but not all of plaintiff's legal theories
• “Rule 54(b) language does not make the judgment final and ap-pealable” when judgment disposed of some but not all of plaintiffs legal theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).