Skip to main content
· 6/25/2010

Murthy v. Vilsack

Citations

  • 609 F.3d 460
  • 391 U.S. App. D.C. 251
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13099
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,926
  • 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1299
  • 2010 WL 2540389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal of an action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies does not preclude refiling of the action after exhausV tion
  • “[A]llowing Murthy to cure his failure to exhaust administrative remedies by amending his complaint would contravene EEOC’s investigative duty and undermine Congress’ policy of encouraging informal resolution up to the 180th day.” (internal quotation omitted)
  • noting that 180-day waiting period is mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.