· 6/25/2010
Murthy v. Vilsack
Citations
- 609 F.3d 460
- 391 U.S. App. D.C. 251
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13099
- 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,926
- 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1299
- 2010 WL 2540389
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that dismissal of an action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies does not preclude refiling of the action after exhausV tion
- “[A]llowing Murthy to cure his failure to exhaust administrative remedies by amending his complaint would contravene EEOC’s investigative duty and undermine Congress’ policy of encouraging informal resolution up to the 180th day.” (internal quotation omitted)
- noting that 180-day waiting period is mandatory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.