MURSTEN CONST. CO. v. CES Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying recovery under payment bond where the moving party failed to comply with notice requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• North American Spec. Ins. v. Bergeron Dev.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-22· cited 12×
• Professional Plast. v. Bridgeport-Strasberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-12· cited 6×
• Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-08· cited 5×
• NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INS. v. Hughes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-07· cited 5×
• Bridgeport Inc. v. Rinker Materials Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-23· cited 4×
• WMS Construction, Inc. v. North American Specialty Insurance Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-02· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Home Elec. of Dade County, Inc. v. Gonas
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-06· cited 14×
• Stresscon v. Madiedo
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-06-13· cited 13×
• Stresscon v. Madiedo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-05· cited 2×
• CORP. OF PRESIDENT OF LATTER DAY CH. OF JESUS CHRIST v. Seymour Elec. Supply Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-28· cited 1×