Murrell v. Exchange Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing a mineral reservation to exclude bauxite in part because open-pit bauxite mining “would destroy the value of the land for farming purposes, or any other purpose,” and the position of the parties indicated that the property was intended by the parties to be used as a “farm home”
• reservation of “all coal and mineral deposits” did not include bauxite

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).