Murrell v. American Railway Express Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing FHA claim where there was “simply nothing other than Plaintiff’s legal conclusions in the [complaint] from which the court could surmise that ‘animus against the [disabled] was a significant factor’ in any position taken by Defendants”
• “[B]ecause the preclusive effect of a New York state court decision is asserted, the Court must consider New York’s law of res judicata.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).