Skip to main content
· 3/16/2015

Murray v. Super

Citations

  • 87 Mass. App. Ct. 146
  • 26 N.E.3d 1116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • detailed findings are required to justify treating financial contributions from new spouse as source of funds available to support child of prior marriage
  • “The judge found that the [noncustodial] father ha[d] a strong bond with the children, [wa]s an active and involved parent, coache[ed] them in their athletic activities, attend[ed] church regularly with them, and ha[d] never missed parenting time with them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cypher, Wolohojian, Blake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.