Murray v. Stegemeier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that attorney’s third party claim against successor attorney is sufficient to withstand motion to dismiss without discussion of policy issues
• holding that third-party complaint’s contribution claim was valid cause of action
• allowing a claim for contribution without discussion of public policy concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).