Court of Appeals of Texas· 3/13/1991
Murray v. State
Citations
- 804 S.W.2d 279
- 1991 WL 32337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a machine cannot be a declarant nor make statements
- explaining computer stored data is hearsay whereas computer self-generated data is not
- record of electronic keycard access to hotel room not statement of person and not hearsay
- concerning electronic door lock recording device
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spurlock, Farris, Day
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-01-18· cited 298×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-07-19· cited 77×
- Ash v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1996-08-01· cited 69×
- Michael James Reed, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2013-09-05· cited 34×
- Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-12-20· cited 31×
- Stevenson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1996-01-23· cited 31×
- Gustavo Dominguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2013-04-18· cited 24×
- Baker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-10-10· cited 18×
- Ly v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-10-12· cited 17×
- Kevin Royce Peek v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2015-04-16· cited 14×
- Pitre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-03-15· cited 10×
- Miller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-09-13· cited 9×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-10· cited 5×
- State v. GojcajConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-06-24
- Therman Maurice Skillern v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-12-07
- Harold Miller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-04-06
- Holden Meril Baker v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-10-10
- Kevin Brook Kugley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-06-20
- David Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-05-13
- Jose Sauceda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-07-28
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-29· cited 429×
- Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-21· cited 331×
- McQueen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-08· cited 330×
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-12-04· cited 291×
- Miller-El v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-01-17· cited 270×
- Human v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-03-16· cited 206×
- Lugo-Lugo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-04-27· cited 201×
- Lambright v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1984-10-09· cited 186×
- Saldivar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-12-14· cited 69×
- Musgrave v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-12-23· cited 41×
- Bosier v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1989-05-18· cited 23×
- Brady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-08· cited 12×
- Carl John Connolly and Paul Connolly v. William v. Farmer, Individually, and as Surviving Husband of Edith P. FarmerFifth Circuit· 1973-09-12· cited 7×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.