Skip to main content

Murray v. State

Citations

  • 804 S.W.2d 279
  • 1991 WL 32337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a machine cannot be a declarant nor make statements
  • explaining computer stored data is hearsay whereas computer self-generated data is not
  • record of electronic keycard access to hotel room not statement of person and not hearsay
  • concerning electronic door lock recording device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spurlock, Farris, Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.