Murray v. St. Louis Cable & Western Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that, under the State and Federal Constitutions, defendant did not invoke the right to remain silent under Miranda when officer twice asked defendant if he had anything more to say, and defendant responded “[n]o, sir,” but then answered additional questions
• stating that “a trial judge is vested with wide discretion when considering plea agreements and is free to reject an agreement”
• “When a defendant invokes his right to remain silent, the police must ‘scrupulously honor’ that invocation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).