Skip to main content
· 9/28/1989

Murray v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Citations

  • 722 F. Supp. 1500
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12424
  • 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,554
  • 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1736
  • 1989 WL 122615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting employer’s motion for summary judgment despite supervisor’s inquiries about plaintiffs retirement plans did not constitute evidence of age discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ann Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.