· 9/28/1989
Murray v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Citations
- 722 F. Supp. 1500
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12424
- 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,554
- 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1736
- 1989 WL 122615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting employer’s motion for summary judgment despite supervisor’s inquiries about plaintiffs retirement plans did not constitute evidence of age discrimination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ann Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.