Murray v. Pearce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that DCL § 276-a explicitly puts the transferee’s intent at issue, and therefore, as a matter of statutory construction, its absence from DCL § 276 indicates that only the trans-feror’s intent is at issue in that provision
• “The party seeking to set aside the transfers as constructively fraudulent bears the burden to prove the elements of constructive fraud by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).