Murray v. O & a Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party waived argument that pleadings did not support charge submission by failing to make timely objection to charge on that ground
• holding that, having failed to except to the lack of pleadings at any point during trial, the defendant waived any error in the plaintiff’s pleadings
• holding that, having failed to except to the lack of pleadings at any point during trial, the defendant waived any error in the plaintiff = s pleadings
• holding that the unexcused violation of a penal statute constitutes a breach of a duty of care if the statute was designed to prevent injuries to the class of persons to which the injured party belongs
• holding that the unexcused violation of a penal statute constitutes a breach of a duty of care if the statute was designed to prevent injuries to the class of persons to which the injured party belongs
• holding party waived argument that pleadings did not support charge submission by failing to make a timely objection to the charge on that ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).