Murray v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clear and convincing standard “applies when valid legal title is undisputed and the controversy involves only beneficial title”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Semaan
  California Supreme Court· 2007-08-13· cited 23×
• Coyne v. De Leo
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-07-30· cited 22×
• Welther v. Donell (In re Oakmore Ranch Management)
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-01-20· cited 11×
• Cecconi v. Cecconi (In Re Cecconi)
  N.D. California· 2007-04-17· cited 2×
• Coyne v. De Leo
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-08-28

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marvin v. Marvin
  California Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 396×
• In Re the Marriage of Weaver
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-10-03· cited 40×
• Protestant Episcopal Church v. Barker
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-01-30· cited 34×
• Bryce v. O'BRIEN
  California Supreme Court· 1936-03-17· cited 23×
• Olson v. Olson
  California Supreme Court· 1935-09-30· cited 23×
• De Laguna Spaulding v. Jones
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-04-30· cited 21×
• Tannehill v. Finch
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-12-22· cited 14×
• Rench v. McMullen
  California Court of Appeal· 1947-12-15· cited 12×
• Green v. MacAdam
  California Court of Appeal· 1959-11-20· cited 12×
• Toney v. Nolder
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-10-25· cited 12×