Murray v. Mariner Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the 2003 amendments to section 440.09(l)(b) were intended to \overrule” this court's interpretation of the phrase \major contributing cause” in Closet Maid v. Sykes, 763 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000
• “A rule of statutory construction which is relevant ... is that where two statutory provisions are in conflict, the specific provision controls the general provision”
• additionally certifying a question of great public importance
• interpreting section 440.34, Florida Statutes (2003)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).