Supreme Court· 2/5/1934
Murray v. Joe Gerrick & Co.
Citations
- 291 U.S. 315
- 54 S. Ct. 432
- 78 L. Ed. 821
- 1934 U.S. LEXIS 507
- 92 A.L.R. 1259
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If it were held that beneficiaries may sue, pursuant to the compensation law, we should have the incongruous situation that this law is in part effective and in part ineffective within the area under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Congress did not intend such a result.”
- in causes of action occurring in a place subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the united States, 16 U.S.C. § 457 requires a federal court to apply “existing law, as declared from time to time by the state [within which] the cause of action occurred”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court· 1988-05-23· cited 319×
- James Stewart & Co. v. SadrakulaSupreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 234×
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court· 1944-03-13· cited 177×
- New Jersey v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 83×
- United States v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1973-06-04· cited 82×
- Albert Roelofs, Jr. v. United States of America, the Travelers Insurance Company, IntervenorFifth Circuit· 1974-09-16· cited 66×
- Mater v. HolleyFifth Circuit· 1952-11-29· cited 64×
- Atkinson v. State Tax Comm'n of Ore.Supreme Court· 1938-01-31· cited 50×
- Rita Jean Vasina, as of the Estate of William Arthur Vasina, Deceased v. Grumman Corp. And Grumman Aerospace Corp.Second Circuit· 1981-03-17· cited 49×
- Knott Corporation v. FurmanFourth Circuit· 1947-06-16· cited 36×
- Prescott v. United StatesD. Nevada· 1981-09-09· cited 28×
- Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-25· cited 19×
- Vincent v. General Dynamics Corp.N.D. Texas· 1977-02-23· cited 17×
- Gravois v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1965-06-07· cited 17×
- Herken v. GlynnSupreme Court of Kansas· 1940-05-04· cited 16×
- Employers' Liability Assurance Ltd. v. DiLeoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-09-24· cited 11×
- Buttery v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1941-04-21· cited 10×
- Kitchens v. DuffieldOhio Court of Appeals· 1947-10-06· cited 9×
- Vasina v. Grumman Corp.E.D. New York· 1980-06-27· cited 8×
- Koren v. Martin Marietta Services, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 1998-03-06· cited 7×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Murray v. Joe Gerrick & Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.