Murray v. Hy Cite Corp./Royal Prestige

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case where removal petition “merely allege[d] a violation of [plaintiff’s] right to equal protection in the most vague and conclusory fashion”
• insufficient “[to] allege a violation of [a] right to equal protection in the most vague and conclusory fashion”
• “[T]he removal petition must contain sufficient facts to show that there was such a denial by the state court and a citation or reference to a state law that deprived the petitioner of equal protection.”
• “[T]he removal petition must contain sufficient facts to show that there was such a denial by the state court and a citation or reference to a state law that deprived the petitioner of equal protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).