Murray v. Ferry-Boat F. B. Nimick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he prior act must not be too remote and must be closely related in time and nature to the offense charged.”
• evidence of prior rape was admissible to establish the defendant’s intent to commit the charged rape
• evidence “that appellant had previously attempted to take money from an individual during a routine traffic stop * * * tended to show a scheme or plan which was relevant to the crime charged”
• evidence of other acts of a defendant is admissible only when it is relevant to prove the guilt of the defendant of the offense in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).