Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 5/12/1998
Murray v. D & J Motor Co., Inc.
Citations
- 1998 OK CIV APP 69
- 958 P.2d 823
- 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1177
- 69 O.B.A.J. 2266
- 1998 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 53
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that fraudulent misrepresentations “concerning the condition, value, quality, characteristics or fitness of the goods” could render an “as is” clause “unreasonable and ineffective”
- \as is\ clause is not a defense to a claim alleging deceptive and unfair trade practices under the state's consumer protection statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rapp, Stubblefield, Reif
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Oriental Trading Co., Inc., a Nebraska Corporation v. Sam G. Firetti Bing RanEighth Circuit· 2001-01-10· cited 98×
- Specialty Beverages, L.L.C v. Pabst Brewing Co.Tenth Circuit· 2008-08-19· cited 88×
- Streeks, Inc. v. Diamond Hill Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-01-21· cited 64×
- DEBRA F. FINK v. Ricoh Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-07-31· cited 36×
- Fricano v. Bank of America NACourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2015-12-23· cited 17×
- Rose v. Colorado Factory HomesColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-02-17· cited 7×
- Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-03-21· cited 7×
- OAK TREE PARTNERS, LLC v. WILLIAMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-11-26· cited 5×
- Moore v. PendavinjiAppellate Court of Illinois· 2024-10-15· cited 5×
- Anderson v. Dow Agrosciences LLCW.D. Oklahoma· 2003-05-14· cited 4×
- Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-03-20· cited 3×
- Oriental Trading Co. v. Sam G. FirettiEighth Circuit· 2001-01-10
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1988-06-21· cited 94×
- Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-25· cited 69×
- Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1995-11-28· cited 61×
- Wetsel v. Independent School District I-1Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1983-09-13· cited 55×
- Stapleton v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1952-11-18· cited 54×
- ZD Howard Company v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1975-06-17· cited 51×
- Blankenship v. Northtown Ford, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-04-16· cited 35×
- Whitson v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 30×
- Tinker v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-04· cited 26×
- Wilkerson Motor Co., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1978-01-31· cited 25×
- P.E.A.C.E. Corp. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1977-07-26· cited 22×
- Maybee v. Jacobs Motor Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-07-20· cited 21×
- DeLong v. Hilltop Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-06-11· cited 20×
- Ozark Kenworth, Inc. v. NeideckerSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-07-16· cited 20×
- Shelton v. FarkasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-11-05· cited 12×
- Department of Public Safety v. KrahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1977-09-27· cited 12×
- Slusher v. Jack Roach Cadillac, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-09-23· cited 11×
- Greene v. HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1954-09-28· cited 10×
- Mulkey v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1957-07-02· cited 8×
- Wright v. CiesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-07-16· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.