Murray v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• anything short of an unqualified, unequivocal assent to the request to submit to chemical testing is a refusal
• anything short of an unqualified, unequivocal assent to the request to submit to chemical testing is a refusal
• anything short of an unqualified, unequivocal assent to the request to submit to chemical testing is a refusal
• anything short of unqualified, unequivocal assent to request to submit to chemical testing is refusal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Ingram
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-09-13· cited 91×
• Mueller v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-29· cited 22×
• Todd v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-11-07
• PennDOT v. Savini
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-08-17
• PennDOT v. Leaver
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1993-08-16
• M.J. Norris v. Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-11-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Mumma
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-15· cited 54×
• Wheatley v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-02-23· cited 32×
• Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Jones
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-06· cited 28×
• Larkin v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-30· cited 23×
• Vasiliades v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-02· cited 6×