Murray v. Auslander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider whether class should be certified under Rule 23(b)(3) where the district court had made no findings on that issue
• named plaintiffs are typical of the class where they “possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members”
• named plaintiffs are typical of the class where they “possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members”
• “Monetary relief predominates in (b)(2) class actions unless it is incidental to requested injunctive or declaratory relief.” (alterations adopted; internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “The typicality requirement may be satisfied despite substantial factual differences, however, when there is a ‘strong similarity of legal theories.’” (citation omitted)
• “[T]here is no requirement here that issues subject to generalized proof predominate over those subject to individualized proofs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).