Skip to main content
· 11/15/1887

Murray v. Albertson

Citations

  • 50 N.J.L. 167
  • 13 A. 394
  • 1887 N.J. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a utility district held an exclusive franchise notwithstanding a city charter provision to the contrary
  • stating that the utility district was “granted exclusively the right to furnish the services in question until it is established that public convenience and necessity requires otherwise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Affirmance, Brown, Clement, Depue, Dixon, Gregor, None, Paterson, Reed, Reversal, Soudder, Syokel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.