Murray Rubber Co. v. Wood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this was enough to rebut the defendants’ claim that they were acting in good faith in violat ing the FLSA
• holding district court did not abuse its discretion for failing to reduce attorney fees because the plaintiffs did not recover 100% of their claimed damages
• noting that “[i]t is easier for a plaintiff to receive liquidated damages under the FLSA than it is to extend the statute of limitations for FLSA claims”
• applying the Hensley framework to fee award determinations under the FLSA
• award of liquidated damages was not erroneous where employer made no inquiry to ascertain whether it was complying with the FLSA
• “It is easier for a plaintiff to receive liquidated damages under the FLSA than it is to extend the statute of limitations for FLSA claims____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).