Murray Co. v. Satterfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Superior Court ‘‘exceeded [its] limited scope of review’’ by, in essence, finding facts and substituting them for those of referee and board when it relied on ‘‘ ‘uncontradicted testi- mony’ ’’ in form of assertions made by plaintiff on appeal forms to board and to court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).