Skip to main content
· 3/9/2017

Murra v. Farrauto

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 842

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed. Appellant never identified his objection to the trial court's settlement agreement or release of claims and how it favors the appellees, or how he is prejudiced. As such, the trial court did not err in fashioning a settlement entry and release of claims in order to reach a fair and just result. Nor did the trial court err as a matter of law in granting in part, and denying in part, appellant's motion to enforce settlement agreement.

Judges: Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.