Murphy v. United Steelworkers Local No. 5705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that prejudgment interest “serves two purposes: it promotes early settlements, and more importantly, it compensates persons for the loss of use of money that was rightfully theirs”
• holding that punitive damages were not \pecuniary\
• finding plausible ratification argument where union failed to quell violence and lacked full knowledge of incidents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).