Murphy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that trial court “correctly concluded that the loss 2 of employment was a collateral consequence of Murphy’s plea”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Odegaard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-28· cited 12×
• Ayesh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-01

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• State v. Partlow
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-20· cited 69×
• Watrous v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 28×