Murphy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tolling for period between request and grant of change of judge, which occurred on the same day, and date defendant appeared before new judge
• “[A]ppellant’s request for a change of judge, which was sustained, was by his action and agreement and is not to be included in the 180-day period of limitation.”
• delay resulting from defendant’s request for change of judge tolled statutory period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Clark v. Long
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-02-23· cited 25×
• State v. Galvan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-09-11· cited 23×
• Carson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-06-30· cited 12×
• O'NEAL v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-06-25· cited 8×
• State v. Walker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-09-04· cited 4×
• State v. Morehouse
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-04-06· cited 1×
• State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Coty M. Pilkerton, Appellant.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2025-06-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Kemp v. Hodge
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-03-09· cited 39×
• State v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-02-19· cited 38×
• People v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-04-09· cited 20×
• State Ex Rel. Haynes v. Bellamy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-01-12· cited 13×