Murphy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where transcript of trial “contains irremediable and substantial omissions and obvious and egregious error in the portions which do exist,” new trial is required “in the interest of justice and due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vilsaint v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-02· cited 2×
• Scala and Weitz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-15· cited 1×
• V.T.Z. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-19
• Hernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-28

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delap v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-09-29· cited 61×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-06-22· cited 16×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 13×
• Rozier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-13· cited 11×
• Blasco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-25· cited 11×
• Fairell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-08· cited 10×
• Felton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-04-19· cited 8×
• McKenzie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-07· cited 8×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-30· cited 2×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-25· cited 2×
• Bogdanowicz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-29· cited 1×