Murphy v. SmithKline Beecham Animal Health Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We agree with this line of authority, and hold that APHIS intended to pre-empt state common law as well as state statutes.”
• “The Court regrets the fact that its decision leaves the plaintiff without a remedy at law, but unfortunately, we are left with no alternative. The court’s decision is dictated by Congress’s broad grant of authority to USDA, and the agency’s permissible exercise of that authority.”
• “The Court regrets the fact that its decision leaves the plaintiff without a remedy at law, but unfortunately, we are left with no alternative. The court’s decision is dictated by Congress’s broad grant of authority to USDA, and the agency’s permissible exercise of that authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).