Skip to main content
· 9/21/1965

Murphy v. Kodz

Citations

  • 351 F.2d 163
  • 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district courts 25 have discretion to dismiss a complaint and remand a case to state court “[w]here the federal head 26 of jurisdiction has vanished from the case, and there has been no substantial commitment of 27 judicial resources to the nonfederal claims”
  • removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442 properly removed the “entire case in both its federal and non-federal facets”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.