Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/21/2020
Murphy v. Hall
Citations
- 141 N.E.3d 1064
- 2020 Ohio 163
Syllabus
PROBATE - declaratory judgment proceedings on remand affirmative defense counterclaim setoff Civ.R. 8(C) and 13 restitution equity
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the trial court did not err by construing defendant’s affirmative defense for setoff as a counterclaim under Civ.R. 8(C
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court· 1995-10-31· cited 594×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-10-05· cited 194×
- Home Builders Ass'n v. City of BeavercreekOhio Supreme Court· 2000-06-14· cited 48×
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc. v. Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC (In Re U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.)S.D. Ohio· 2005-08-01· cited 22×
- Bret Lewis v. United Joint VentureSixth Circuit· 2012-08-09· cited 11×
- Resco Holdings, L.C.C. v. AIU Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-19· cited 11×
- King v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-08· cited 3×
- Murphy v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.