Eighth Circuit· 8/26/2010

Murphy v. FedEx National LTL, Inc.

Citations

618 F.3d 893
16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 952
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17834
160 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 35,806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing the “law-of-the-case” doctrine, which “requires courts to adhere to decisions made in earlier proceedings”
“The law-of-the-case doctrine only applies to final orders, not interlocutory orders.” (also citing Gander Mountain Co., 540 F.3d at 830)
“Before an employee can claim FMLA protection, . . . the employee must put the statute in play[.] (citing Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas, 580 F.3d 781, 787 (8th Cir. 2009))
“Before an employee can claim FMLA protection, . . . the employee must put the statute in play[.] (citing Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas, 580 F.3d 781, 787 (8th Cir. 2009))
addressing conditional cross appeal due to remand on other issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Hansen, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.