Skip to main content
· 8/26/2010

Murphy v. FedEx National LTL, Inc.

Citations

  • 618 F.3d 893
  • 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 952
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17834
  • 160 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 35,806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the “law-of-the-case” doctrine, which “requires courts to adhere to decisions made in earlier proceedings”
  • “The law-of-the-case doctrine only applies to final orders, not interlocutory orders.” (also citing Gander Mountain Co., 540 F.3d at 830)
  • “Before an employee can claim FMLA protection, . . . the employee must put the statute in play[.] (citing Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas, 580 F.3d 781, 787 (8th Cir. 2009))
  • “Before an employee can claim FMLA protection, . . . the employee must put the statute in play[.] (citing Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas, 580 F.3d 781, 787 (8th Cir. 2009))
  • addressing conditional cross appeal due to remand on other issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Hansen, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.