Murphy v. Conway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• any possible error was harmless because excluded testimony was cumulative, inasmuch as there was other testimony giving the same information
• any possible error was harmless because excluded testimony was cumulative, inasmuch as there was other testimony giving the same information
• any possible error was harmless because the excluded testimony was cumulative, inasmuch as there was other testimony describing the same symptoms
• expert testimony of physicians necessary to establish standard of care
• death from massive streptococcal infection two days after Caesarean delivery
• alleged admission of “improper, unskillful, [and] negligent treatment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).