Murphy v. Brilliant Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rule that subsequently acquired title enures to benefit of grantee “prevent[s] circuity of action, and carr[ies] into effect the manifest intention of the parties”
• “It is no doubt true, that the grantor in a deed poll, and, to some extent, all who claim title under him, are bound by recitals in the deed.”
• “The general rule, that, where one conveys land, with general covenant of warranty of title to the grantee, his heirs and assigns, all title subsequently acquired by the grantor will enure for the benefit of the grantee, is well established.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).