Skip to main content
· 9/12/1997

Murphy v. Allora

Citations

  • 977 F. Supp. 748
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16168
  • 1997 WL 634300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that the 30-day removal period 13 commenced when the defendant had notice of the proceedings
  • complaint considered received when individual named as a defendant receives it, or when it is received by an agent authorized to receive service of process on behalf of named defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Payne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.