Skip to main content
· 9/26/2023

MURPHY, JEDIDIAH ISAAC v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the failure of Congress to draft an exclusion for certain collective bargaining agreements in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 365(a
  • concluding that because Congress did not draft an exclusion for collective bargaining agreements from the terms of section 365, Congress intended section 365 apply to those agreements
  • recognizing that the business judgment rule is used in reviewing motions to reject executory contracts
  • holding that § 365(a) applied to collective-bargaining agreements covered by the National Labor Relations Act because Congress failed to draft an exclusion for them
  • holding that § 365(a) applied to collective-bargaining agreements covered by the National Labor Relations Act because Congress failed to draft an exclusion for them
  • holding that an execu-tory contract is one on which performance is due to some extent on both sides

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.